站内查询
您现在的位置是:主页 > 葡京游艺城app下载 > 依法打擊職業吃貨須多維度發力
依法打擊職業吃貨須多維度發力
2020-01-06 00:06  www.idc-online.cn

  ●所謂“職業吃貨”,指的是一些網購者利用網絡平臺規則漏洞,要求商家“只退款不退貨”從而“吃貨”,還有部分“吃貨”會借機向商家索取高額賠償金

●'s so-called "professional food lovers ", refers to some online shoppers using the Internet platform rules loopholes, requiring merchants to" refund not return "and thus" eat ", and some "eat" will take advantage of the opportunity to ask merchants for high compensation

  ●“職業吃貨”不需要多少本錢,也不需要太多專業知識,幾乎是零門檻。如今,甚至還發展出了教授“吃貨”方法以及售賣個人信息、制造假證的黑灰產業鏈

●“ Professional food lovers "do not need much money, do not need too much expertise, almost zero threshold. Even now, it has developed a black-ash industry chain that teaches "food-eating" and sells personal information and produces fake certificates

  ●對于“職業吃貨”的追責不應止步于民事領域,還可以從刑事、行政等多方著手。有關部門應嚴格按照相關法律法規執法,對此種惡意行為絕不姑息,構成刑事犯罪的則應嚴厲打擊,徹底打消“職業吃貨”的違法念頭

● The pursuit of responsibility for "professional food lovers" should not stop in the civil sphere, but should start with criminal, administrative and other aspects. The relevant departments should strictly follow the relevant laws and regulations to enforce the law.

  不到4個月,在淘寶網下單4276筆,提起惡意退款訂單3896筆,其中退款成功3787筆,總計退款金額達20余萬元——廣東男子宏某的“胃口”著實不小。近日,浙江省杭州互聯網法院依法判決宏某承擔侵權責任,賠償原告淘寶網要求的1元錢及律師費1萬元。

In less than four months,4276 orders were placed on Taobao, and 3896 malicious refund orders were filed, of which 3787 were successful, with a total refund amounting to more than 200,000 yuan - the \"appetite\" of Guangdong man Hongmou is really not small. Recently, the Hangzhou Internet Court of Zhejiang Province ruled that Hongmou assumed tort liability according to law, compensation for the plaintiff Taobao required 1 yuan and legal fees of 10,000 yuan.

  這不是“職業吃貨”第一次栽跟頭。不久前,在受到媒體廣泛關注的“職業吃貨”第一案中,湖南女子周某一個多月里下單633筆,申請退款624筆,卻拒不退貨。這一行為被法院認定為破壞購物生態環境,擾亂社會經濟秩序,損害社會公共利益。

This is not the first time \"professional food lovers\" have stumbled. Not long ago, in the first case of \"professional food lovers \", widely watched by the media, hunan woman zhou in more than a month to order 633, apply for a refund of 624, but refused to return. This act is regarded by the court as destroying the ecological environment of shopping, disturbing the social and economic order and harming the public interest.

  多位專家在接受《法制日報》記者采訪時說,1元錢的賠償具有象征意義。法院判決認定被告濫用會員權利,并界定上述“退款而不退貨”的吃貨行為系“非生活消費所需”的惡意行為,是平臺規則法治化的一種體現,對于構建良好的網絡營商環境具有重要意義。

In an interview with the legal daily, experts said the $1 compensation was symbolic. The court decided that the defendant abused his membership rights and defined the above-mentioned \"refund but not return\" food lovers behavior is \"non-living consumption needs\" malicious behavior, is a platform rule of law embodiment, for the construction of a good network business environment is of great significance.

  與此同時,對于“職業吃貨”的追責不應止步于民事領域。受訪專家認為,還可以從刑事、行政等多方著手,有關部門要嚴格按照相關法律法規執法,對此種惡意行為絕不姑息,構成刑事犯罪的則應嚴厲打擊,徹底打消“職業吃貨”的違法念頭。

At the same time, the accountability of \"professional food lovers\" should not stop at the civil domain. Interviewed experts believe that the criminal, administrative and other parties to start, the relevant departments strictly in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations to enforce the law, such malicious acts will not be tolerated, constitute a criminal offence should be severely cracked down, thoroughly eliminate the \"professional food lovers\" illegal idea.

  宏某和“職業吃貨”第一案中的周某一樣,在網上頻頻下單并退貨,然后只是填寫了一個虛假的物流單號,實際上“退回”的貨物永遠都到不了商家手里。

Hongmou and \"professional food lovers\" in the first case of Zhou Mou, in the online frequent orders and return, and then just fill in a false logistics single number, in fact,\" return \"goods will never be in the hands of the merchant.

  宏某與周某代表著一種“新興職